By Yan Zhou · Sources checked September 7, 2026 · Independent parent guide, not an official YCDSB publication.
If your child is in senior kindergarten, Grade 1 or Grade 2, ask the school three things: when their early reading screening happens, what the result shows, and what teaching or support follows. A screening result should lead to a clear conversation about learning. It is not a label for your child or an instruction to buy a reading program.
In Ontario’s publicly funded schools, ministry-approved screening covers Year 2 of Kindergarten (SK) through Grade 2. Provincial requirements are set out in Policy/Program Memorandum 168.
In this guide
Screening is a starting point, not a diagnosis
A screening tool checks particular early reading skills to help identify students who may need support. It does not establish a diagnosis. The Ontario Human Rights Commission distinguishes screening for risk from diagnostic assessment in its Right to Read chapter on early screening.
Think of the result as a prompt for a better question: “What does my child need to learn next?” Avoid turning “below benchmark” into “cannot read,” or “met benchmark” into “will never need help.” A brief check cannot describe everything a child understands, enjoys, says, reads or writes.
YCDSB describes screening as a short, one-to-one check that may involve letters, sounds or sounding out words. Its published overview says no special preparation is needed and results do not affect grades. The page identifies Acadience as the tool used in its implementation. Confirm the current school-year tool and process in your school’s notice. Read YCDSB’s screening explanation.
Know the provincial timeline
Under PPM 168, the first screening must normally be completed before mid-November. Students who do not meet the benchmark require a second screening by mid-March; a second screening is optional for students who do meet it. First results appear in the January–February reporting period, and second results in the June report. Results below benchmark should also be communicated promptly. Principals, in consultation with teachers, may adjust timing in a student’s best interest and must notify parents in advance. See the screening and reporting requirements.
That leaves an important parent question: “When will we talk about the result?” Do not assume that a formal report-card date is the only opportunity to discuss reading. If you are already worried, contact the teacher now and ask what they are seeing.
Keep the screening date beside the result. A number without the grade, time of year, tool and measure is difficult to interpret. If you cannot find the formal report, the YCDSB parent apps guide explains where report cards and classroom materials are accessed.
Six questions that make a result useful
1. Which skills did this screening check?
Ask the teacher to translate the measure names into plain English. Was your child naming letters, connecting letters to sounds, blending sounds, reading words, or reading a passage? Not every grade completes the same tasks.
YRDSB’s assessment and reporting overview illustrates how screening tasks vary by grade and reading measure. Use your own board’s information for your child; another board’s table is not proof that the identical task was administered.
A useful follow-up is, “Could you show me the kind of skill involved, using a teaching example?” You need to understand the learning target, not obtain a copy of secure screening items.
2. What does the overall result hide or highlight?
Ask which individual measures are strengths and which need attention. YCDSB explains that the component scores contribute to a composite result, with benchmarks linked to grade and time of year. Its benchmark explanation is a useful starting point.
For example, a parent might hear that a child knows many letter sounds but has difficulty combining them into words. That suggests a more precise discussion than “reading is weak.” Ask the teacher to explain your child’s actual profile rather than applying this hypothetical example.
3. Does the result match classroom observations?
Bring one or two concrete observations: your child remembers a favourite story but struggles with unfamiliar printed words, avoids reading aloud, or can read a short passage but cannot explain it. These are observations to discuss, not diagnoses.
Ask what the teacher notices during everyday instruction. If home and school seem different, explore the materials, language, task length, familiarity and amount of help involved. A child reciting a well-known book and a child independently reading unfamiliar text are doing different things.
4. What will school do next?
Ask for the target skill, the teaching approach, who provides it, and how often it happens. “Extra help” becomes clearer when you know whether it means a small-group lesson, individual instruction, adapted classroom practice or another support.
Access to tiered reading instruction is based on need, not on already having a disability identification or special education services. PPM 168 states this explicitly. Ask what can begin now while any other discussions continue.
5. How will we know whether the support is helping?
Agree on a review date and the evidence you will discuss. Ask, “What would useful progress look like before that meeting?” The answer should connect to the skill being taught, not just the number of minutes spent on an app or worksheet.
A review might compare several classroom observations or repeated skill checks chosen by the teacher. Ask how the school will respond if progress is limited: change the approach, increase support, or involve other school staff. These are planning questions, not promises that every child follows the same schedule.
6. What should we do at home—and what should we leave to school?
Request one small activity that matches current instruction, along with a demonstration. Ask how to respond when your child gets stuck and how long the teacher expects practice to take. “Read more” is less helpful than knowing which material and what kind of support to provide.
It is reasonable to say, “We can manage a few calm minutes after dinner; we cannot sustain an hour of extra lessons.” Use the homework-without-stress guide to protect a routine that remains manageable.
Bring this short checklist to the conversation
- The date, tool and benchmark result, if you have them.
- One recent example of reading that felt comfortable and one that felt difficult.
- The language or languages your child uses and the materials they encounter at home.
- Any relevant existing school accommodations.
- Your questions about the next teaching step and follow-up date.
You do not need a large binder or daily scores. A brief note can be enough: “On Tuesday, Sam read the familiar book confidently but needed help with several words in a new book. What do you notice with unfamiliar text at school?”
For help keeping the meeting focused, use the parent-teacher conference guide. End by summarizing the plan in ordinary language and confirming when you will reconnect.
Support reading without rehearsing the screening
Keep shared reading enjoyable. You can read an interesting book aloud, talk about an illustration, ask what a character might do next, or invite your child to explain a favourite part. For the child’s own reading practice, ask the teacher for materials matched to the skills being taught.
Do not drill the screening items or treat every evening as a timed test. Tell your child that the teacher is finding out what to teach next. If they become frustrated, pause and note where the task became difficult. Send that information to the teacher instead of turning it into a longer struggle.
Frequently asked questions
Does a below-benchmark result mean dyslexia?
No. Screening identifies risk; it does not diagnose a reading disability. Ask what instruction and follow-up are needed, and whether further school assessment is appropriate. Do not use an online checklist or one score to label your child.
What if my child meets the benchmark but still struggles?
Raise the concern anyway. Share specific examples and ask the teacher to examine the relevant skill. Meeting a screening benchmark is not a reason to dismiss a concern about classroom reading, understanding text, or independent work.
What happens in French Immersion?
The board decides whether screening uses the program’s instructional language or the board’s language. Ask which language and tool apply to your child and how the result is interpreted. PPM 168 explains the board’s role.
Is this the same issue as YCDSB’s ILIT change?
No. This guide concerns early screening in SK–Grade 2. The separate literacy-support guide after ILIT discusses a different program decision affecting Grades 4–5. Ask about the support attached to your child’s needs and grade.
Sources
- Ontario Ministry of Education: PPM 168, Reading Instruction and Early Reading Screening
- YCDSB: Early Reading Screening
- YRDSB: assessment, reporting and screening measures
- Ontario Human Rights Commission: Right to Read, early screening
Last verified: September 7, 2026. This is independent parent information, not a diagnostic guide or official board publication. Confirm your school’s current arrangements.
Explore the Parent Resource Library or browse all articles. For a question about these resources, use the secure contact form; do not include confidential student records.